Creativity should be social. That should take priority for true success. And here's how...
First engagement into the vastly underserved embryonic inception or "kitchen table" phase:
The embryonic inception or "kitchen table" phase of entrepreneurship is the most vastly underserved.
FoolQuest.com exists in striving to even start filling that gap in (pre-)incubation.
Begin browsing.
Establish contact whenever as required or desired, for whatever support required or desired. Begin responding on the forums in order also to help draw others into the discussion, or else via email if its private. Join in creative problem solving, posting on topic in contribution, by articulating your questions, arguing your criticism, offering suggestions and working out your ongoing creative input, into a) unfinished fiction b) entrepreneurial and/or activist proposals under development on FoolQuest.com
For now, just hold up your end of the conversation, not only advancing your own ideas but also by making comment, continually adding to and modifying the input of others, back and forth. If this collaborative process for you continues to derive satisfaction, then go ahead and begin pitching your own story ideas and entrepreneurial concepts alike, as well, for similar feedback and input in collaborative process with others. This is how we can begin working together, in art for art's sake via collaborative fiction brainstorming as unique to FoolQuest.com, and innovatively towards management team formation and business planning in new venture creation, with all due diligence.
As a Savant Explorer, whatever is not clear, just ask: Articulate whatever questions, point out whatever is unclear and explain how so, and keep at it.
For now, to reiterate, just hold up your end of the conversation. If the process is productive and appealing, hopefully new talent and wide ranging expertise can be drawn in as well, so that creative people can meet, bond, network and organize, all in the way that is best for creative people to relate, by free exchange, participation together into creative process, and not by arbitrary and stultifying conformity for the comfort of mediocre cretins. -optimal adaptation of our social environment to our own needs, proactively, rather than resignation to adapting, compromising ourselves, in reaction to such frequently hostile, barren, stultifying and predatory situations as have so frequently become the norm. FoolQuest.com also provides for your review and comment, further discourse upon how to proceed in innovative new venture creation from such barest beginnings, if all goes well, rising to challenges and coping with foreseeable obstacles along the way.
Why?
To what end?
Because, we all need one
another!
I am Aaron Agassi
and just maybe I can be here for you. Would you then be
there for me?
In the alternative to the futility of going it alone even with the best well-formed plan, I can readily conjecture, both in general principle and also in some strategic particulars as herein set forth, the unpopular idea and untried germ of a transparent and straightforward regimen of deliberately engineered circumstance, a new social compact, an as yet entirely hypothetical intentionally engineered situation under which such might be freely achievable by interaction among more than one at all serious and responsible person, each in the first place actually yearning for the interpersonal outreach and connection so consistently frustrated, progress actually proceeding and coming forth as by product from any of that seriously happy pleasurable and meaningful engagement, with less small talk, fun at all, from intrinsic motivation, together rejecting oppression under the currently prevalent and paradigmatic stultifyingly heteronymous rat race which, after all, ever stays alive for anybody, only so long as anyone at all, even howsoever reluctantly participates.
All manner of individual flaws and frustrations are resident merely at the metaphorical tip of the proverbial iceberg. The massive swell of motivation lurking beneath that already troubled facade form the larger and deeper issues of personal integrity. And the lives we lead are much the same: There are all manner of superficial practical challenges, already daunting enough. But these, likewise, are but features of the proverbial tip of the metaphorical iceberg. Looming beneath the already troubled surface are the larger and deeper issues of arête, the right way to live.
The answer, then, is that the first step is simply for each of us to keep at it holding up their end partaking in the happiness of serious conjecturally open ended strategic discussion, planning, criticism, problem solving and failure analysis all as applicable, upon the above central problem of attaining such life of intrinsic motivation in pleasurable and meaningful engagement. -A discussion that even by itself, will be more uplifting, supportive and hopeful of capable autonomy, happy freedom and power, than avoiding the truth and pressing on and staying the course in ever mounting bored and lonely heteronymous futility or else just collapsing in bitter surrender and despair. But the point in strategic planning, beyond discourse in and of itself, is always progress and readiness towards implementation.
Social order derives it's legitimacy from values
of
autonomy,
in ongoing subversive disruption of social order of of
heteronomy
that has no rightful claim upon our allegiance.
Happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk.
KNOW MORE “Birth, School, Work, Death” in that immortal driving staccato refrain of The Godfathers, describes the uniform administratively convenient and largely submissive status quo path of ready-made career purpose: Children are educated to function and to cooperate with and within such existing framework of options. Innovation of entirely new options of purpose and participatory cooperation, however lionized as rôle model, all such glowing lip service not withstanding, remains exceptional, the achievement of self-made and dauntless charismatic genius, whose very rare existence by overcoming all resistance, serves to vindicate the very educational system, employment arena and society at large, that has done all to thwart them, cradle to grave. For to say the least, education aimed at turning out, if no longer exactly utter drones and manual laborers, still nevertheless, generally compliant corporate employees and public servants, remains unlikely to produce many pioneers and innovators or well nurture and cater to such vastly underserved intrinsic motives of autonomy and capability, but often hinders them instead, if not, indeed, by pandemic serial bullying outright, then especially by ubiquitous grinding cultural propaganda:
In the
biting prose of Kathleen Norris: "When you are unhappy,
is there anything more maddening than to be told that you
should be contented with your lot?" Among similarly
dehumanizing doctrines,
Mysticism the likes of the
Zen, in such zealous
preference for inaction, is pernicious, because, though in
life there are no guarantees, in the words of Benjamin
Disraeli: "Action may
not always bring happiness, but there is no happiness without action.”
Among so many salient reasons, Behaviorism
in cavalier dismissal of Psychodynamics and the human
condition, is likewise pernicious, because in the admonition
of Benjamin Franklin: "Never confuse motion with action.”
And in life as in
drama,
meaningful
action derives, karmically, no less from
motive and
values
than dharmically, just
situationally.
The above chart, the incisive work of Cuddly Cyborg, is taken as most salient point of departure: The chart well demarcates mere giftedness and aware intellect, perhaps of an Antonio Salieri, from the extreme genius and distinct talent, even such as of an Amadeus Mozart. Some measure of the former, any deeper thought at all, often arises as disposition, but also remains always among the personal choices open to most anyone, though so often socially discouraged, abandoned to our own devices, all aforementioned lip service to the contrary not withstanding.
This proposal is for a gifted circle, striving to meet the underserved needs thereof. Let Existential validation be taken as given merely in the embrace of values of autonomy, with affirmation in practice: This proposed circle is conceived NOT as yet another bogus support group. Time is not to be wasted in cultivation of consensual validation, precious time better invested in discourse, among equals, civil, open and critical, in flagrant violation of the near-far taboo, by following through from the abstract and general in the purest pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, all the way through to practical and concrete application, research, planning and every due diligence, all in order to follow through in active implementation and hoped for desirable results. Even the invaluable exchange of expert advice, contacts and personal assistance, as of professional circles and networking groups, is conceived as secondary to the principle focus, being: actual collaboration and innovation, proposed demarcation whereof and rationale in detail, all immediately to follow:
KNOW MORE Indeed, fulfillment derives from engagement in pleasurable and meaningful activity, that are intrinsic motivations: Creativity for its own joy, and innovation which is purposefully creative problem solving, being more than solitary pursuits, are often underserved as social needs for optimal reciprocal engagement that may best be facilitated via creativity and art for art's sake in collaborative fiction writing and via innovation (which is, by contrast, any more purposeful creativity as in problem solving) towards truly ambitious entrepreneurial/activist new venture creation, that are the foci of this outreach for partners both or either therein. By initiating any cohesive ongoing free exchange so unlike anything that I have been able to find already established and in practice, online on the attached forums or even locally and face to face, I hope not only for critical input and feedback to my own ideas and those of the other participants, but even new beginnings and real progress towards organization and implementation.
|
|
|
KNOW MORE Let's do something amazing together! Social capital accrues via social "proof" (informational social influence): Participants in such interaction as herein proposed, of steady progress in research, organization and strategic planning, all in preparation towards success, consequently will be perceived as more interesting and attractive. And the interpersonal networking and promotion entailed in collective endeavor, will also help build and share a solid supporting platform for ongoing and more systematic generation and effective follow up of leads, promising and rewarding individual personal connections, by actually capitalizing upon how relationship arises only as a byproduct of open and purposeful interaction and howsoever substantive communication between individuals, and not via any bogus, anti-intellectual, timid, reactionary, superficial and even somewhat emotionally retarded indoctrinairy socialization as suitable only to whatever systematic social bribe/threat of popularity/unpopularity Behaviorally reinforcing the life drudgery and endless travail of oppressive conformity.
Alas how egalitarian cooperation and problem solving, so vital to fulfillment and human happiness, come almost in afterthought, so jarringly out of place among the social aptitudes of heteronymously smooth hierarchical conformity as recognized by Cultural Anthropology, being as they are, emphasized in oppressively unhappy conventional society. And yet, it has been observed how gifted students amongst their own true gifted peers, are found suddenly and mysteriously no longer to require the great boon of indoctrination called: socialization! And precisely such observations only serve to fuel all the more, prevailing alienation and common complaint of upside down and false priorities in life, of the metaphorical tail wagging the proverbial dog. But what is the cure? Is it possible and desirable then, intentionally, by agreement within such as the proposed gifted circle, instead, to decide and agree to deliberately flout and reverse the norm, by taking initiative in radically emphasizing the egalitarian creative problem solving while expressly deemphasizing all of that dreary "correct" enforced superficial hierarchical conformity? Or are our habits of interaction and their broader context at large, all just fate set in stone?
Happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk.
And that is one reason for this, my own convivial outreach for new partners in joint authorship in innovative dramatic Science Fiction writing and collaboration in entrepreneurial and activist new venture creation.
Another reason is more personal, having to do with essential human social desires: There is no shortage of ever much the same ubiquitous platitude running thin, ever the same common sense free advice, that isn't actually true and doesn't actually work; or all manner of popularity and success gurus with whatever great secret. As if struggling with such silly obscure riddles, any more than simply following instructions, were ever, or ever could be, the key to life! The very question actually most substantively crucial and so often overlooked in approaching human interaction, is simply of the satisfaction of intrinsic interpersonal stimulus needs:
|
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE -or is it?
Collaborative fiction brainstorming workshop
There are all manner of projects in shared collaborative World Building of copious, meticulous and sometimes even rigorous background detail, that they often then don't really seem to know what to do with. There is high powered collaboration in video and even feature movie production, frequently with no attention to scripting. Bad scripts are often imposed arbitrarily and in advance. Joint authorship in fiction, has been abandoned to the mercies of various online communities of grandiose delusionally malagendaed willfully amateurish pipedreaming dilettantery that give fanfic such a bad name. Now, while there are many of what amount to worthless online support groups or forums for writers, there are also plenty of excellent writers groups online for the exchange of genuine critique even of high caliber in order to nurture and cultivate talent and improve in fiction writing competence and the discipline of the writing craft. But for some reason, unlike the former snot-nosed blockheads, the latter serious writers are rarely if ever seen actually to collaborate. This leaves a considerable gap in valuable creative social experience and resource of informed and capable productive joint authorship in fiction writing.
At all serious writing is long traditionally solitary. What a waste! What squandered social and imaginative opportunity! For sheer creativity, more egalitarian, problem-centered rather than ego-centered, the unique first key complementary agenda of Foo
A selection of notions, provocations and unfinished works along with extensive tools and guides to creativity, drama and the discipline of the writing craft, are provided.
|
|
Solicitation for entrepreneurial co-founders in new venture creation and activism
FoolQuest.com is also targeted to fill the gap of vastly underserved needs, in the utterly neglected very earliest embryonic path of concerted effort over time, discussion, research and networking even from the "kitchen table" phase or stage of
Various proposals in ongoing development are showcased. Pitch your own, too!
|
A better way, together? But how can such peaks of sustained happiness best be achieved, on ones own terms, while steering clear of stultifying unhappy and un-free servitude of dysfunctional family, school and employment? Most people largely tolerate things as they are, only much interesting themselves in at least seemingly moderate and realistic ambitions. For in the immortal words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” Indeed, from much that very sentiment, often ensues enthusiastic recommendation of whatever strategies of extreme rugged self reliance, ever so much easier said than done, frustrating and often intensely lonely. Others, even the more introveritedly, go further, extolling either heteronymously collective cheerful delusion or else the private crushing extinction of all hope in order to achieve sublime apathy and become free of often frustrated desire and therefore suffering, while others still extol amoral manipulation as key to popularity and success. But in the alternative to sheer predation, going it alone, utter denial, making do or just giving up, as Margaret Mead famously and "unreasonably" remarked: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” And to quote Epicurus once more: “Of all the means to insure happiness throughout the whole life, by far the most important is the acquisition of friends.” Indeed, as Schopenhauer observes: “Friends and acquaintances are the surest passport to fortune.” Moreover, even every pleasure, creativity and discovery on the journey to success, all quickly fade, becoming empty and dull with no one to share it with. And as shall be seen, only in respecting autonomy is there possibility of meaningful engagement into true attachment. That is why social isolation, particularly as deliberately inflicted by bullying, is so destructive. Are bullies destroying your ability to compete?
Private reflection better informs consultation and deliberation with others towards free decision for oneself, what is important, not just as to such matters of practicality as when to spend, when to invest, or even personal preferences such as to what stuff you really even want, where and how best to make acquisition, but that all resources, tangible and intangible, are well directed towards real value and effect, and not just frittered away on associated advertising mystique and sublimation. Because care and savvy consumerism in the acquisition of material possessions, is the least of challenges to rational scrutiny and informed consent to every cherished value in which we are each so vested in the ongoing Existential bait-and-switch that is the human condition. In the words of Socrates: “"An unexamined life is not worth living for a human being.” Therefore, we must never quail from Philosophy and the scientific quest for truth (defined as: correspondence to reality in assertions) in the responsible honest autonomy of unfettered reflection, open Dialectic discourse and fearless controversy of critical investigation and creativity among equals, Axiologically and strategically. Because, while social support stands among the strongest known predictors of individual success with the possible exception of self-efficacy, cooperation in tough and realistic though no less ambitious hardnosed planning, endless research, feasibility study and preparation, above all staying interested: persistence in due diligence, all remain key in addressing the issues and vastly underserved needs of the fist concept "kitchen table stage" or phase of new venture creation all from scratch, ex nihilo.
Eudemonia is not asceticism. Opulent standards of living are among the great achievements of civilization, industry and automation. But higher even ever more care free standards of living, food, medicine, convenience, relative comfort, even luxury and hedonistic pleasure, are only the beginning of human needs. It turns out that experiences are a better buy for happiness than possessions. As Epicurus said: “Not what we have but what we enjoy, constitutes our abundance.” Eudemonia subversively embraces life, purposeful work and the leisure of play, not just acquisition and possession. Leading a life, and not just making a living, depth, not just immediacy, quality over quantity. Real growth in every sense, not just economic boom and bust: In entrepreneurial terms, creation of meaningful value not empty travail.
|
|
|
Stay interested
“"An unexamined life is not worth living for a human being.” — Socrates
Beware irrelevant Malagenda of second degree pipedream and heteronymous taboo upon agenda discussion
The controversial Philosophical explorations, hypertexts in brainstorming and in the discipline of the dramatic writing craft, and compiled business research and Entrepreneurial research on FoolQuest.com, each come in adjunct to the agenda expounded herein.
FoolQuest.com argues passionately in opposition to unduly fragile misanthropic life strategies of serenity in heteronymous submission to a'priori lowered expectations and deranged Pollyanna sweet reason in the face of unchecked and pervasive bullying. In the words of Epicurus: “Not what we have but what we enjoy, constitutes our abundance.” And we must extricate from every artificial scarcity, bait-and-switchand anhedonic heteronomy, the autonomy and abundance of which we are robbed. That is the true to life lesson of drama addressing every hope of growth in Menschlichkeit, any dharmic skill in functioning as more effective and better people towards one another.
• The range of longstanding traditional recommendations
herein rejected as oppressive and unsuitable, how and why so... (If I've heard it all before, then my rebuttal is already here.)Not convinced?
But perhaps, gentle reader, whatever your own intrinsic needs, deep desires and cherished values simply differ at all from my own.
So, what is the true essence of arête, and how might your own better new ideas, considered recommendations and personal wish list take shape and unfold, differently than mine as on this page?
Let's all talk this over!
Are you bullied?
Am I your unmet friend?
Let's do something amazing together!
Solicitation for entrepreneurial co-founders
and fiction brainstorming workshop
Copyright 2012 - 2023 by Aaron Agassi