





-
EVERYTHING YOU EVER
-
WANTED TO WRITE ABOUT SEX*
*But where too breathless and demure to research!



|
The American Heritage®
Dictionary of
the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000. |
| |
| sex
appeal |
| |
| NOUN: |
1. Physical
attractiveness or personal qualities that arouse others sexually. 2.
Slang General appeal; power to interest or attract.
|
Writing is like making love. Don't worry
about the orgasm, just concentrate on the process.
—Isabel Allende
The only good
plot is a
delayed fuck.
—Louis B. Mayer
If you write fiction you are, in a sense,
corrupted. There's a tremendous corruptibility for the fiction writer because
you're dealing mainly with sex and violence. These remain the basic
themes,
they're the basic themes of Shakespeare whether you like it or not.
—Anthony Burgess
A dirty mind is a joy forever.
—Oscar Wilde
•more
aphorisms
Q.
What
is
sex appeal?
-Or, Was it Good for You
Too?
A. crucial to
believable biology and culture in World Building,
can
onstage
Sex in
the Story and
issues of fantastic carnality, after all no less consequential and
significant than in either
innate
or
extrinsic
reality,
indeed, such an elemental life long
dimension of the human condition and the world we live in or most any other,
hence
reciprocally integral to much the same writing
competency
as,
and surely among the
fundamentals
of fiction writing,
ever properly comprise a
subject matter apart?

"Nothing risqué, nothing gained." ~Alexander
Woollcott
What is true love, the course if which so seldom runs
smooth? What are the
Epistemology
and Ontology
of the heart? For it remains unproblematic to state that any experience of
emotion may be vivid and intense, all fulfilling Descartes' famous criteria of
clarity and distinctness.
But as Sigmund Freud revealed, Descartes was, quite
frankly, as self deluded as any enamored and besotted schoolboy poet! After all, much that
is intense, vivid and crystal clear superficially, nevertheless is all only the
tip of the iceberg, with far more beneath the murky depths, both deep within and
ever outward into the real world.
For even love itself is empty of inherency and
contingent upon wider context.
Love is not merely what one feels obviously, no matter
the object d'amore; rather,
love is the
climactic revelation of how one actually relates to another,
motivation and disposition of interaction along with rationalizing
perceptions consistent to
characterization, then all followed by a
denouement of insightful
free
choice.
Indeed, even the tamest "child safe" and most cerebral of tales will not be truly
and utterly sexless, because even the most superficial believable
characters
must behave at all according to their relationships,
roles and
gender, among all other credible background
to
setting and
amid
milieu.
Nor certainly Y/A, the Young Adult categories and genres, pandering and
dripping with innocent preconscious desire. All consistently inexplicit, yet
without, by any measure, the subtly of
racier
subtext.
Or else compelling
characters
must have a passion for something at all! And any
prudish would be fiction writer to understand and accept even this little above,
nevertheless to eliminate or ignore
sexuality entirely rather than "tastefully" submerging sexuality safely beneath
the surface, will write only turgid tripe. -Certainly if love at all is absent,
especially from a child
character, unless in psychological horror.
Stories are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely
as to the plot
situation, but
because of the reader or audience relationship, actual
motivated feelings
elicited for or even against the
characters.
"Desire intrigues us, stirs the soul. We love stories about desire--tales of
love, sex, wanderlust, haunting nostalgia, boundless ambition, and tragic loss.
Many of the great secular thinkers of our time have made this fire, this force
that so haunts us, the centerpiece of their thinking." observes Ronald Rolheiser
in 'The Holy Longing.'
Even if not by anything so vulgar or blatant as any particular explicit sex act
or most basic plotline of an
encounter, enticement,
onstage sex appeal or
seduction of one
kind or another or by one means or another may be crucial in a story, or
otherwise, one way or another, for sex appeal generally to factor into relationship and interaction and provide the opportunity for one
character to
flatter, flirt,
seduce,
beguile, to
motivate or influence,
even
manipulate,
or, likewise, to be
motivated or influenced, even
manipulated, by another
character, to succumb or to resist, colluding and abetting or refusing and defecting, trust or control, even in confrontation with
sexual politics at it's
very worst.
The three
motivating
principle cofactors in effective
manipulation
are whatever the incentive and disincentive vulnerabilities of the target(s),
the tactics of the
manipulator(s), and time for the relationship to develop under
whatever conditions, free or
captive.
The phenomenon of
manipulation
is best defined as undue advantage from trickery via the exploitation of
affective innate and conditioned triggers or "push buttons" to undermine and
overwhelm, even barrage, resistance, caution, better judgment and
autonomy of
the target, via insidiously
motivating
subtext
of emotional positive incentive and negative disincentive. –As distinct from
open coercion alone or substantive disinformation, lies. Typically, the
manipulator obfuscates the nature of their coercion exercised, along with
whatever self-serving advantage thereof, whatever their own ultimate
motivation.
Positive incentive
manipulation
is such as deviously appeals to
value in fantasy and desire,
love, sex greed, promoting false hope of whatever gain, in order to circumvent
or overwhelm resistance, caution, better judgment and
autonomy of the target.
Whereas an example of negative disincentive
manipulation, such insult as
condescension that after all comes of love can be less painful than insult that
comes without it, or more so, or equally so, as the case may be: but be that as
it may, it is, in any case significantly more harmful. This is because insult
provokes anger and hostility, but hostility towards people who even sincerely
profess to love you and act on your own best interest is curbed and turned
inwards, internalized, and experienced on the
level
of
inner
conflict of
self-hostility, namely guilt. Such deceptive appeals undermining the target’s
credulity and defenses even whilst actually exercising coercion constitute often
likewise internalized flagrantly
manipulative
behavior, conscious or unconscious, selfish, indifferent or just desperate.
Indeed, no, it does not actually "take two to tango" given an intransigent
antagonist one way or another aggressing upon an entirely unwilling protagonist.
Nevertheless, even dearest lovers, often no less
volatile, after all, than the most hateful sworn enemies, may often find
themselves bypassing, stressfully, rather than actually communicating smoothly,
and thus raising tension until coming into
conflict on
different
levels, even
to the point of bitter quarrel. For whatever significance and expectations, deep as they might run,
may nevertheless be revealed not to be intrinsic or universal, after all, but
personal, variable and even
antithetical.
Because
variables of rounded
characterization
and
situation
from which
levels
of conflict
arise, must include not only anatomical sex, physique,
voice
and so on, as well
as mannerisms and style, together with sexual preference or
orientation,
sexroles, gender
identity and also the yin/yang of
gender
culture and stereotypical dysfunctionality, such as, incidentally,
may also be associated
Epistemologically as rational and
Empirical
Versus intuitive or not only
culturally but more specifically to
setting geographically as Occidental Versus
Oriental
:
All inner reflection upon life must fall somewhere upon the scale from
whatever "masculine," practical, binary, linear, logistic,
goal-oriented
motivation ever
put forth,
versus "feminine," passionate, flexible, emotional, social, process-orientation.
Indeed, how perverse
the destructive and dishonest lengths that some people will go simply out of decidophobic
conflict
aversion, ultimately the devious nastiness and harm they will do, just to avoid
ever confronting error or flaw of their own, and all starting from the putative
motivating
goal so blithely
put forth
or only implied, of never hurting anyone else's feelings. A position scarcely
any better balanced than the seemingly opposite extreme, the puerile and
Sophomorically maladjusted Fascist ideation of truth and honesty only
attainable by the utter abandonment of civility and decency, all to be
despised as bourgeois and effete.
Stereotypically, by upbringing, men have trouble expressing, much less
explaining, their feelings, and women have trouble understanding, much less
explaining, their reasons. And this accounts for how men and women
manipulate one
another. Because, to quote Sigmund Freud "that which is not expressed, is
acted
out,."
And so, men must
act
out,
according to damagingly immature
emotionality while women must connive according to disastrously half-baked plans
and dangerous social myths. Of course, there are also men and women who may
actually dysfunction according to the opposite gender stereotype. It all depends
upon the emotional path of least resistance under conditions of and on the
level
of
inner
conflict.
And just such stereotypic dysfunction will tend to influence audience or reader
sympathy according to gender as well. Because the ambivalence of indecisive
women leaves men confused or upset, while the ambivalent mixed signals of men
make women frantic. Hence, Sadistic or controlling
manipulation and
ingratiating lies generally manifest as deliberate escalation of just such behavior in order to heighten the
confusion, distress and suffering. Indeed, such are the different methods of self
destructive problem solving of each gender. For cluelessly
Occidental / masculine
characters, even however contrived
plot
oriented problem
solving, even to the lack of lucid and compassionate sensitivity, while, for
disturbed or even hysteric feminine
characters, even
manipulatively
pressing
motivation unto
melodramatic
climax, no matter how
needlessly tragic, plus, perhaps, an Oriental preoccupation with social
standing and identity and all sacrifices pursuant to upkeep thereof.
Indeed, archetypically, any penchant for
melodrama may be in
some account be driven by a feminine or Oriental keen interest in nuanced social
involvement, hence lack of rational detachment but hence flexibility and tolerance
for
ambiguity, weighing more variables productive and functionally in prefrontal
cortex functions of divergent and broader holistic
situational
Gestalt
synthesis and multitasking but paralytic, destructive,
dysfunctional and oppressive in approval seeking and vulnerability to peer
pressure with all to much stomach for
Inductivist lies, injustice
and consensus
manipulation.
While, archetypically,
men or Occidentals, by contrast, may be more interested in prefrontal cortex
functions of convergent direct
dialectical reasoning, single minded
compartmentalization, focused upon one task at a time, cleaving of truth from
falsehood much as victor from vanquished, without compromise, yet perhaps
lacking in not only in compassionate and merciful accommodation or any other
hidden agenda but also complexity,
depth or subtlety.
The failure of divergence is fanaticism while the failure of convergence is
incoherence.
Be
a Mensch!
A synthesis of single minded convergent thinking with nuanced
situational
Gestalt may be achievable in the intellectual
cultural Jewish
trait or aptitude of justice, proportion, perspective and whole integrity,
especially as refined in prewar Germany, by Einstein, Freud and Marx, Relativistically,
via the integrative synthesis of divergent frames of reference
or
POV, everything from time dilation and inner life to a larger view of
economics, overviews and special cases.
- All factors that may play into differing
values
and
levels, priority and coping in
case of
conflict
between responsibility to oneself and responsibility to others.
Indeed,
Problem Solving and Justification are reciprocal
functions, one must be shaped to rationalize the other, with integrity or else
into hypocrisy.
Desperate as bullies typically are for validation in all disregard of sanity
and reality, indeed only a complete Sociopath is ever surprised that harm done without
regard to others may injure good will in return. But all first impressions tend
to uncomplicated objectification, the stimulus response of selfish desire and gratification,
for advantage, amusement, comfort or
sex
or else threat, revulsion and
avoidance. Rather, it is the individual baggage of
characterization
that complicates. And the first question is neither of intimacy nor distance, but zero-sum
versus non-zero-sum. Why, just possibly, even a deadly enemy may be intimidated
into keeping out of one's way to allow the same in return, barely
resolution
forestalling zero-sum
conflict
for advantage at the other's cost, even to the
ultimate.
Why then, must dearest lovers compromise and sacrifice all that is of
real
meaning? Why, only for a codependent false sense of security. Such are
controlling fear based relationships. A zero-sum relationship is one in which
the parties each gain only from what the other gives up, but non-zero-sum
denotes productively actually coming out ahead. Reciprocal gains without
reciprocal cost. Indeed, ultimately, true love should be free to
Altruism,
advancing the interests of the beloved, and deserves reciprocation. And so, what
must accrue, lofty romantic perseverance and illusion, vulgar and cynical
tit-for-tat, even
jeopardy of the complete breakdown of trust? Indeed, the shortest distance, the
straight line, is the least common path to any happy ending, if at all. Nor will
anything so simple, with no
obstacle or
complication
to keep the outcome in doubt, ever make
for
drama, only
pandering
at best.
A standard plotline is that of the uncertain
tribulation of
Romance until happy
resolution. And as a common
subplot, this
becomes the development of a a relationship, an alliance necessary
to further the main plot. Indeed, virtually all
relationship of whatever kind
go though stages,
with
choices
at every stage, either to advance, stagnate, slow, reverse or
exit, all beginning with some sort of first discovery,
Romance
even courtship, so to speak, even "the honeymoon," but
cannot omit inevitably
coming into
conflict on
many
levels,
misunderstanding, insecurity, power struggle, friction which is normal and even
healthy (not to mention more dangerous
obstacles of passion as denial,
jealousy and anger), and in order to survive must reach acceptance in
order to commit to substantive cooperation and collaboration or else
progressively
dissolve
and fail, all the harder from which to recover.
The
Rules, so called, codify common ruthless
manipulation
by women, basically by gold diggers of one stripe or another. Although, if it
makes anyone feel any better, it may often be suggested that all such classic
feminine whiles and connivance are but the classic tactics of the oppressed,
collaboration with the abuser adaptive of real deadly
captivity even
dating from ancient
time frame. And even in recent generations, livelihood and survival remained very
much at stake.
But now a days in our affluent world, there is the painful luxury of reflection,
the
Socratic worthlessness of the unexamined life, and the tragedy of women
playing the same games, but playing so very badly, even seemingly
Masochistically, the
reality of
Stockholm Syndrome (even as
prevalent, by degrees) being nowhere ever near as gratifying as the
kinky
fairy tale.
Intensity, uncertainty,
every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting,
temptation, curiosity and hesitation, all the
sexual
tension of freedom,
autonomy,
choice,
responsibility, all calling to self-realization hither to inconceivable, the
permissiveness of emerging and
relevant
romance from crushingly repressive tradition of honor killing,
prostitution, arranged marriage
or cutthroat mercenary matrimonial competition around the world, is the outward
struggle with maddening indecision,
levels
of
inner
conflict as
often arises between desires and confusion or fear, between what one wants and
what one thinks one wants or ought to, desperation for validation, guilt.
Between the crutches of insecurity and the yearning for genuine warmth,
fraudulent conditionality versus genuine intimacy.
Indeed, the reason nice guys finish last, is because the sheer cruelty and
emptiness of the old wretched game, and a very serious business it was, the sexrole
of exploitative cynical struggle for survival by womankind effectively
obstructed or
deterred from gainful careers reserved for their men folk, depends upon frigid
depraved indifference and avoiding the central
tragedy
of historical
Romance, namely the dire danger of involvement and grave sacrifice presented
in a man that a woman might care for, therefore useless from the perspective of
a controlling gold digger, being however for real, emotionally accessible and at
all beyond simple control by
manipulation.
Now days, however, the rising standard of living has reduced real literal
survival pressure enough that emotional need emerges and
loneliness takes hold.
But the same intergenerational transactional "script" remains, now become
maladaptive.
Hence, not only do such desperate women still expertly sabotage love, but they
have lost the sterner stuff for effective exploitation of men. As a result, they
attain involvement, but mostly in the Ecclesiastical
futility of pointlessly unhappy
melodrama, aggravation and petty vicissitude. They have lost tradition and
still fallen behind the times, abiding in limbo and achieving the worst of both
worlds, a decided
dramatic
low point.
Hence, a sympathetic romantic heroine is one who finds in herself the courage
for
growth and
hope to reach out, and her romantic lead is he who awakens her. Otherwise, to
paraphrase Nietzsche, even a princess of fools is a laughable bimbo herself! -And her
Prince Charming is likely just another thugly playa.
Antithetical
foils.
-
Characters develop out of
situation,
and
plot
ideas emerge from
characters
in different
situations
and the actions undertaken because of their relationships and
conflict on
many
levels,
the friction entailed as
characters
come into contact,
dramatic
conflict on many
levels,
internal and external, classic
reversal in social
connection as in the estrangement of the
bullied idealistic
whistle
blower.
All manner of situations,
even quite unforeseen, may present any range of
obstacles,
from an empty bread box standing in the way of the perfect sandwich, perplexing riddles and secrets denying truth,
engineering limitations in the path of invention or a natural disaster barring
very survival, but also, no less, a bad hair day spoiling
Romance or a
misunderstanding threatening love.
The
dramatic
efficacy of revealing and
motivated
subtext
is in
frustrated
desire, giving rise to need and ingenuity.
Drama is the
gripping and engaging
tension-laden
presentation of conflict
on many
levels,
whether or not the storyline is even believable.
Drama is conflict
inherent to
situation,
conflict
being more than merely an event, but a condition, a relationship.
Alas, however, beware! poor staging or presentation of conflict
on any
level
dissipates
inherent
drama. No
Powderpuff Pitty-Pat! Throughout the
plot,
every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting
is heightened as things are made more difficult, the personal
emotional
stakes
are raised, and
character
growth is pressed by
worsening
complications for an active protagonist. So navigate the various possible
paths and
dead ends and to
find
stories always
dig
deeper for insight into
struggle.
Each event in sequence that
follows from
motivated
character action consistent with background, must in turn initiate from
observable proximate stimulus unless entirely emerging from inner life, and,
either way, rather than simply remaining mysterious, known only the mind of the
character, must one way or another be
shown intelligibly to the audience, even if none of any other
characters; either way, in turn, quite probably another vitally important
plot point.
Whenever the cause and effect chain ever omits such links, expect
plot holes
stumbling amid succession of unrelated events.
Sexual
tension
S
tories
and
scenes
are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the
plot
situation, but
because of the reader or audience relationship, actual
motivated feelings
elicited for or even against the
characters.
Inevitably, to
show or
evoke
characterization,
wherein
motivation should
be apparent, even through
thoughts, however expository,
onstage
sex
appeal may
dramatically
motivate
conflict
on many
levels, emerging through
subtext,
What
Lurks Beneath and
body language, all
shown by way of each of the
senses in
setting,
action and atmospheric
tone along with the
Subtle and
Delicate Art of Doublespeak
dialogue, may either harmonize with
text, or in true
Method subtext, all even
disagree with text, subtly, so as to draw attention into a
deeper vein or
level of
conflict by being subtly
wrong
,
with
the obstacles
to love
promoting
sexual
tension; love, hate,
desire, attraction,
increasing the
tension
and pathos
of
every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting and
anticipation,
even discomfort and
aversion,
character
conflict on
many
levels among the
dramatis personae, within society,
against fate or simply oneself, building upon
levels
of
inner
conflict, stress, desperation,
indecision and frustration that must culminated either in resignation, despair,
resolve or madness, not to mention
Transference and the compelling transport of high
fantasy reaching
From Werewolf Sex To Bunny Love, not just
Writing Love
Scenes, or if one prefers,
Quality Sex Scenes, but everything from the
'rules' for romance writing offering concise guidance for the
dramatic
plot
structure of
melodramatic pandering
affirming and empowering
girl
cooties, all as doubtless programmed into the
Computerized
Romance Writer,
to
erotic role-play of the sage and sexpert advice of
Susie
Bright.
Though as
Sigmund Freud put it, "sex is everything!" Even the saints and poets
yearn to be ravished by God! And where once they sought to share narcotic
communion, one day soon they'll only want to jack into the Net!
Why, even a real boy like
Pinocchio, yearning for his Blue Fairy, may instead become beguiled and
exploited by Dracula's daughter or even the pedophile Coyote spirit of
traditional Native American cautionary fables! Or, more prosaically, in
the course of
growing up, any ordinary person might, likewise, simply become
drawn, by a crush of any sort, to relate to anyone else more human, imperfect
and complicated.
Indeed, at the risk of
seeming Freudian, with all those big eyed bashful peek-a-boo, cuddly bump and
tickle, what, exactly, is 'Teletubbies' but the most blatant and puerile
porno for toddlers?! Brilliant in it's simplicity. Or has some
narrative subtlety eluded me, here?
Kidding aside, 'Teletubbies',
targeted at the youngest viewing audience ever in the history of television, is
age appropriately educationally effective, precisely because preverbal tots
do respond. Indeed, the key in writing to any younger audience or any other
tender sensibility, is never expurgation but simply toning it down one way
or another.
And the point of truth in
jest remains, that the appeal of 'Teletubbies' includes such contact and
expression that is only arbitrarily distinguished and divorced from that which
may be deemed sexual foreplay, indeed such that Freud might well classify as
Infant Sexuality, and without which babies are well known to actually and literally die from
neglect and loneliness.
Sex, as it is so often
said, is natural. And that becomes the rationale for
pandering, even if in the guise of
affirmation and validation,
propaganda outright. However, the begged question
remains. Indeed, as is often asked, is sex necessary? - And, distinct
from just life generally, in works of culture, specifically...
No, of course not.
After all, there are
videos of yarn to fascinate
house cats! (For cats, as everybody knows, though some are quite
affectionate, can often be of that particularly self sufficient temperament all
their own.)
Indeed, any work bowdlerized and
eviscerated becomes flaccid and desiccated, as stilted and inhuman as any
moving lure for dumb animals. Believable and appealing
characters,
however "settled", must be
motivated
and behave and talk according to their relationships and sexroles of whatever
milieu appropriate to the
setting, even in the most cerebral
of stories.
Even eschewing anything
remotely explicit or graphic, the red hot purple passion prose, no matter how tame or "child
safe", in capable fiction sexuality of some kind still manifests itself. For
the key in writing to any younger audience or any other tender sensibility, is
never actually expurgation, but simply toning it down or transposition somehow, but seldom
in truly eliminating every trace of sex.
A story that isn't at all
racy may only omit overt sexuality and strong undercurrents, not sexuality at
all, which is an aspect of human nature,
characterization, relationship and
milieu, setting. After all, as the Good Book
says, "the child is father to the man".
Certainly, all manner of
sexual clichés provide more than just the warning against
tired prose, but also an insight into universal
motivations,
key to more than just
passionate sex scenes as a
writing exercise.
Sexual response
is both innate and cultivated. Sex
elicits affect and entails context. Sex, from furtive eye contact up to
the exchange of bodily fluids and every surrounding ritual, is imbued with
meaning
and values by civilization, personal associations by the individual, and biological
imperatives by evolution.
Sex, as it is so often
said, is natural. And that becomes the rationale for pandering, even if
the most obsequious flattery in
the guise of affirmation and validation, and
propaganda outright. Emotional appeals or
motivation, to the heart, passions, gut feelings, also include loaded or
slanted emotional appeal employing language that is calculated to get a
particular reaction from readers, or even out and out sob stories and soppy
sentimental tearjerkers, even to be rated by the number of hankies needed! manipulating
readers' emotions in order to lead them to draw however unjustified conclusions.
But certainly, there are, always, of course, if not
drama per se,
then loftier
social or entirely artistic aims in any subject matter, delicate or
indelicate. And then again, for writers no less than their
characters, there are
often such
barriers to over come as self-consciousness, even sheer
anhedonic
moralism and
squeamishness outright.
Stories are made memorable
not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the
plot
situation, but
because of the reader or audience relationship, actual
motivated feelings
elicited for or even against the
characters.
And any
motivation may do!
Yes, leave us
face it, sex
appeal may simply pander to sensationalism and/or flights of fantasy, escapism and
wish fulfillment for the reader's guilty vicarious pleasure. After all, as the
old saying goes, sex sells! Blatant or subtle. Certainly, the erotic is a
value, indeed, an
aesthetic category.
But then, even food may serve as well, gluttony as serviceable as debauchery,
also depiction of fantastic wealth or opulence, dripping with money, style,
richness, beyond the dreams of avarice, old money, no less than royalty or
nouveau rich regardless, optionally in contrast to crushing poverty. But there
is no need to approve or disapprove of such wretched excess, only to show it. And what could be more vividly exotic than
Space
Opera fantastic far away planets in the world of the distant future?
Indeed, there is no end to variation to sensory gratification which is but the
least of of sheer wish fulfillment fantasy of any conceivable desire that may be
vicariously pandered to, blissfully unobstructed by any obstacle
of
dramatic
conflict
on many
levels driving any sort of plot.
And of course, beyond sensory gratification or material wealth, there are
also fantasies of the ego, of power, importance and recognition, even love and
acceptance in any context, passion,
Romance, purest exaltation attained, darkest
taboos indulged, friendship, camaraderie, Utopia or transcendence. All manner
of escapism,
Fantasy, Self-Indulgence, and Wish-Fulfillment. After all, as C. S.
Lewis observes, the only person who opposes escape is, by definition, a jailer.
- "genres that are most popular tend to offer magical
resolutions
to irreconcilable social problems and
tensions."
-
- -The utopian
fantasy of Deep Throat
But, please GHOD not just the
belabored bludgeoning obsessions of the writer!
Only tiresome zealots need to be pandered to and stoked upon every single point
of dogmatic ideology.
Of course, the most truly destructive is
manipulative
dishonest
propaganda
pandering to hypocrisy. But if
POV will not be thoughtful and literate, then, at least let us have
good trash,
pandering if we must, self
indulgence of the reader, not the writer, grabbing the readers, not beating them over the head.
Remember to evoke the senses,
show don't
tell action that actually advances the plot. And building the tension
of
every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting,
even in vicarious pandering, depends upon
pacing.
Because, to follow
another old saying, capable
writing still reveals something about human nature. Even sheer vicarious pandering
in it's appeal to the universal fantasies of the audience. While bad writing
tells everything about the author. Particularly when it comes to such awkward
self indulgence that only displays whatever especially obsessive proverbial
"axe to grind", personal preoccupation, attachment or morbid fixation, prurient or otherwise, to the exclusion
of all else.
Prolong the Agony
by making life difficult so as to
motivate
characters.
Don't be nice to your
character! No
Powderpuff Pitty-Pat!
Even pander to vicarious wish fulfillment,
but also inspire
pathos,
anticipation,
every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting
even dread and even the discomfort of sheer
aversion. Stir any range of emotions and force the reader to empathize, to
feel. That's what makes for good entertainment, a real page turner. And so, leave us not forget
error
checking, but learn a
lesson in writing about sex, from the
euphemistically
symbolic to
the clinically explicit, even the
descriptive vocabulary
and
naming of body parts!
from the
past
winners of
The Literary Review's Bad Sex Award
bestowed upon the most pretentious, tasteless, embarrassing, otiose,
self-infatuated or redundant description of the sexual act published during the
past year. nevertheless, perhaps the most debilitating of all fetish
to fiction writing remains the overwhelming and unthinking compulsion to censor
or to Bowdlerize. Again, of necessity, the key in writing "child safe" to
any younger audience or to any other tender sensibility, is never true
and utter expurgation, but simply in toning down anything even remotely
explicit,
skirting the central question by mere tender suggestion, leaving
characterization,
motivation and
drama intact.
- ‘Anyone who attempts to render sexual
experience directly must face the fact that the writings which comprise it are
ludicrous without their
subjective content.’
[If
not somewhat
clinical.]
-Elizabeth Benedict,
Joy of Writing Sex
Q.
What
is
tension?
A.
Tension,
every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting,
anticipation,
clues
and doubt as to the outcome, hence
pathos
and, leave
us face it,
discomfort and
aversion,
may arise even from mystery,
onstage
sex appeal,
the unknown, opportunity and/or threat,
conflict many
levels with
an obstacle, events unfolding or outcome in
any way in doubt. Tension is stress, and the innate or conditioned emotional, neurochemical and physiological preparative change or stress response to
challenge, stimuli or stressors may be either distress and dread as to threat
and emergency or
eustress, the euphoric stress of pleasant anticipation, even
sexual
tension or the demands of
pleasant activities in general,
creativity, power and opportunity.
Even humor or comic relief depends upon tension from an insecurity brought to a
resolution
called the punch line, that may be either surprising or else even obvious and
anticipated, just so long as the tension builds and then crests. Teasing, well
meaning or otherwise, also cultivates and builds stress, tension. So does flirtation, but
likewise
manipulation, rejection or indifference and harassment or threat.
Tension, stress, can be either distress or
eustress.
Every
plotting
Technique
of
building
Suspense
depends upon
pacing,
and for greater tension,
show don't
tell, and never throw the
emotional circuit breaker.
By every
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting,
the rising
tension
and of
dramatic
conflict
signifies that the resolution of whatever the central problem is such as to
increasingly press
character(s) inevitably to take action in struggle with whoever or whatever
the antagonist in some way that must one way or another bring the very
values of said
character(s) into question for them.
The Stress
Vulnerability Model of Psychiatric Disorders is flawed only in that what is called biological vulnerability is,
of course, actually universal in
the human condition. And so, the determinant is nurture, not nature. Obviously,
Neurologucal heredity, biological evolved behavioral genetic nature, only and
fairly consistently enables the
Empirical
capacities for learning by encoding from the
Phenomena,
from experience, from nurture, to begin with. Consistent as remain the genes
themselves, emotion and experience alter the expression thereof,
psychosomatically.
-
Matt
Ridley:
-
•nature
via nurture
Fraudulent
obfuscation and
denial to the contrary are only the current preferred high powered junk
science marketing tactic of the Psychopharmacolical industry,
pandering
to
compassion burn out and desperation, "soullessly" mocking and trivializing such cherished
illusions as the yearning for understanding and with them all Philosophically
meaningful
values arising from the deep wellsprings of human emotional needs.
The kinky
fairy tale of
Stockholm Syndrome
The will to power may be benign, benevolent, malevolent or absent and
ineffectual, as per culturally acquired behavioral patterns and the content of
individual
character. As a matter of conventional sexs, it is said that, one way or
another, while the pleasure principle of power, even if only signifying opportunity, arouses
men, it is mystery that keeps women involved, for better or worse, the worst
being to simply and blithely
act
out,
response to triggers of pernicious
ambivalent conflicting mixed signals, even to the tragic point of veritable
Masochism and it's exemption from responsibility, even the sheer eroticization of learned helplessness.
Indeed, various
manipulative
and destructive cliques, particularly Obscurantist cults and scams,
exploit Stockholm
Syndrome (prevalent in varying degrees) to draw in the mark
in vein hope that things will begin to make more sense as the mystery unfolds.
Alas, real life happy endings are never guaranteed in the face of passivity and love
conquers nothing without backbone, the courage for
individual growth.
The menace of the captor
represents but also deflects a palpable threat of harm to the captive.
And this makes for an
inherently
dramatic
and perversely absorbing good news / bad news
situation
for anyone who ever feels trapped. Bad news in the danger, good news in that it
may be appeased, averted by
manipulation, especially
if redirection
and then validation of intimidation. And that is all that may be needed
for various degrees of
Stockholm
Syndrome behavioral conditioning of
damsels in distress into the very worst
Pursuer-Rescuer
headgames, especially from early on in life.
Alas, there are always those so tragically hardcore and deeply disturbed,
genuinely masochistic and anhedonic, that only real danger and self destruction
remain acceptable and licit. Otherwise, thankfully, just as roller coasters and
other popular "barf-rides" harmlessly simulate the thrill of a nearly averted vehicular
disaster, classic
fairy tale ravishment, bondage and captivity fantasies and
erotic
role-play
can safely liberate into fantasy and teasing sexual foreplay all the classic
drama or
shameless
melodrama,
as the case may be,
forbidden thrill and
every other
Technique
of
Suspense
plotting,
of hope toyed with, of the captive struggling
seductively
to win whatever small kindness of the threatening captor or attacker and
survive, and all manner of desperate desire to be expressed, received and
fulfilled in an all to blatant and obvious paradoxical intention of
"Reverse
Psychology."
"You can barbeque me, hang me, drown me, or skin me, but, please, please,
please
don't throw me into the briar patch!" said Briar Rabbit...
(Oh, don't tease me, please me!)
- "Hm! She is made of harder stuff! Cardinal Fang! Fetch...
- THE COMFY CHAIR!"
Indeed, the kinky
fairy tale
of
Stockholm Syndrome,
by adamant denial unfettered beyond the burdensome restraints logical
contradictions in hard
reality, all of the unflagging faith, goodness empathy and
connection of the innocent and unrecognized virtuous victimized princess soiled
dove, can in the flights of fantasy of
impromptu
Psychodrama, finally and truly be vindicated
by finally at long last redeeming their own unflagging faith in the biggest jerk, most hopeless confirmed looser or even the very
worst villain, abuser or bully!
I knew there was good in you, Daddy...
Well, spank me! So much better than the real thing!
- Kinky
fairy tale ravishment, bondage and captivity fantasies of
erotic
role-play
provide an outlet to
express and fulfill the longing to desire and be desired, desperately.
Whereas the resentment and dependency of the real life Stockholm
Syndrome (prevalent in varying degrees) only accrues, even for the
fairest
damsel in distress
ever "protected,"
just the
very opposite, being taken most utterly for granted and neglected as well
as abused. Indeed, a most fecund
theme of
ironic contrast.
-
- Here, then, is offered a Science Fiction
speculation as a writer's prompt:
-
Dramatic
stories are not usually of happy experiences. Indeed, if the ugly, clumsy and
brutal reality of rape even remotely resembled hot transport of mythological
fairy tale ravishment fantasy,
then rape would not merely have to be legalized, but
made mandatory!
But what may actually yet be feasible is the nigh alchemic transformation of
dysfunctional codependent trailer trash bickering into leather clad stylish hot
vampire monkey sex! All it takes is the recognition of the
surreal and an
appreciation of the absurd. I know you
want to!
Alas, women are all too often encouraged to take men and sexual opportunity for
granted, and, no less prudishly intolerant than men, even to fear, revile and
despise what comes to them too eager and easily,
and in thrall to
Stockholm Syndrome,
to dread the forbidden fruit
and wait patiently and even in some sort of erotic suspense for approval or
permission that will never be forthcoming. Thus indecisive and unfulfilled, they
think they keep their options open while squandering all. Clearly the kinky